Big Ten football realignment speculation has IU in power-packed East

ESPN Big Ten football blogger Adam Rittenberg reported today that Big Ten football division realignment discussions are almost concluded, and the resulting geography-based set-up will likely split Indiana and Purdue into separate divisions, with Rittenberg speculating that Purdue will end up in the “West” division and Indiana in the “East.”

The “East” would also include traditional powerhouse programs Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State and Michigan State, along with newcomers Maryland and Rutgers. The IU-Purdue rivalry would be protected as the only cross-divisional matchup played annually.

Personally, I think it would make much more sense, for competitive balance purposes both currently and historically, to split Michigan State off and put it in the West, while maintaining its annual game with Michigan, and putting both Indiana and Purdue in the East.

Rittenberg’s entire blog post is below:


The Big Ten’s future division alignment is taking shape. Barring a late shift in the discussions between athletic directors and league officials, the only question to sort out is: Will Indiana or Purdue move West?

League sources have told that the Big Ten, as expected, will go with a geographic split for its divisions in 2014. As we first reported last month, time zones are expected to divide the divisions. The only problem: eight Big Ten schools are located in the Eastern time zone, including future members Maryland and Rutgers, while just six are located in the Central time zone.

One team needs to move West, and speculation has centered on three schools: Purdue, Indiana and Michigan State. But Michigan State isn’t in play to move West, sources say, and the debate now is whether Indiana or Purdue enters the “West” division.

Although no announcement is imminent and discussions will continue, here’s what the divisions are expected to look like (the division names have yet to be decided):

“East” division

Michigan State
Ohio State
Penn State
Purdue or Indiana

“West” division

Purdue or Indiana

Before Hoosier fans and Boiler fans panic about their annual rivalry, rest assured that the Bucket game will be preserved with a protected crossover. Barring a change in the discussions, Indiana-Purdue will be the only protected crossover, as the Big Ten wants to create as much flexibility as possible with its schedules.

League sources tell that a 9-game conference schedule likely will go into effect for the 2016 season — there’s still some discussion about a 10-game league slate, but all signs point to nine — and that the goal is for every pair of teams to play at least once every four years.

The proposed alignment likely will spark concern about whether the “East” division — featuring Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State and Michigan State — has too much firepower. You can make a good case (Brian Bennett did) that moving Michigan State to the West creates better competitive balance, but the sentiment among the power brokers is that the West still will have enough substance with Nebraska, Wisconsin, Iowa and an improving Northwestern program. Michigan State athletic director Mark Hollis recently talked about the advantages of being linked to the East Coast and reiterated his desire to play Michigan every year.

So it’s almost certainly coming down to Purdue versus Indiana. Purdue has the richer football heritage, reaching 12 bowl games since the 1997 season. Indiana appears to be on the rise under coach Kevin Wilson but must overcome a history of losing. Both teams have trophy games against other Big Ten squads — Purdue and Illinois play for the Purdue Cannon, while Indiana and Michigan State play for the Old Brass Spittoon — but both series are, in our view, expendable.

My division alignment proposal had Purdue going West, and I’m sticking to it. Purdue is stronger historically and gives the West a program that not long ago was competing for league titles. Although Indiana certainly is headed in the right direction, Purdue is a safer pick to balance out the power in the East.



  1. Competitive balance my arse. The proposed West Division isn’t even in the East’s league, IMO. Unfortunate for us at this point. Maybe starting to slowly make progress. With this alignment, it’s a bowl game opponent every week of the regular season.

  2. Makes no difference, they’ll have to play as hard and smart as possible in either division to gain the success to be the type of program Glass and Wilson envision.

  3. I just hate that they’ll have to sell tickets to Indiana/Rutgers and Indiana/Maryland games. When I’m picking out games to attend those two won’t be in the mix.

    I understand the Big Ten wanting to break into markets geographically but do Rutgers and Maryland even have a fan base large enough to justify admission? Prior to the entry of Virginia Tech and Miami, and before that Florida State, the ‘traditional’ ACC schools couldn’t draw any sort of crowds for their football games. Even today, I doubt that any schools other than FSU or VT sell out their stadiums for any games.

    I wish we could have gotten VT instead of Maryland to break into the mid Atlantic region.

  4. Nebraska must be dancing in the street at this news! This assures that they will go to the Big Ten Championship game, and a bowl game every year.

    The alignment may be geographically correct, but from a competitive standpoint, it’s very unbalanced. The more I learn about the Big Ten’s administrators, the more I’m convinced they are buffoons.

Comments are closed.