NCAA adopts sweeping reforms

We had a lot going on in Chicago today, but don’t think we missed this. The NCAA Division I Board of Directors passed potentially landmark legislation on Thursday hoping to make reforms in a number of areas.

Among them include giving the conferences an option to vote to allow $2,000 on top of scholarships for full cost of attendance. It also allows schools to provide multi-year scholarships that cannot be revoked because of athletic performance. It also approved a policy that would make schools that fail to meet the APR cutline ineligible for postseason play. The cutline will be raised from 900 to 930 in four years.

Eligibility requirements for freshmen were raised from 2.0 to 2.3. Also, there is now a four-day evaluation period in April and the July evaluation period was shortened from 20 days to 12. Also coaches can make unlimited phone calls and text messages to recruits after June at the end of their sophomore years. So yeah, everything Kelvin Sampson did would now be perfectly legal.

The AP story on the legislation is linked here and follows in italics.

INDIANAPOLIS — The scandal-plagued NCAA is moving swiftly to clean up its image.On Thursday, the Division I Board of Directors approved a package of sweeping reforms that gives conferences the option of adding more money to scholarship offers, schools the opportunity to award scholarships for multiple years, imposes tougher academic standards on recruits and changes the summer basketball recruiting model.

“It was one of the most aggressive and fullest agendas the board has ever faced,” NCAA President Mark Emmert said. “They moved with dispatch on it, and I think they’re taking positive steps for schools and student-athletes.”

For decades, outsiders have debated whether college scholarships should include more than just the cost of tuition, room and board, books and fees. Now they can.

The board approved a measure allowing conferences to vote on providing up to $2,000 in spending money, or what the NCAA calls the full cost-of-attendance. Emmert insists it is not pay-for-play, merely the reintroduction of a stipend that existed for college athletes until 1972. He also compared it to the stipends received by other students who receive non-athletic scholarships.

Some thought the total amount should have been higher. At the Big Ten’s basketball media day in Chicago, commissioner Jim Delany said studies have shown the average athlete pays roughly $3,000 to $4,000 out of his or her own pocket in college costs.

But many believe the measure is long overdue.

“I think it needs to happen or else I think what’s left of the system itself is going to implode,” said Ohio University professor, past president of The Drake Group, an NCAA watchdog. “We’ve always lost the moral high ground by saying the educational model is what makes this thing go. I think we’re delivering a model that can exploit kids while they’re here.”

Extra money won’t solve all of the NCAA’s problems.

Schools must infer the cost of additional funding and it will have to be doled out equally to men’s and women’s athletes because of Title IX rules. While BCS schools have the money and are expected to swiftly approve additional funding, it may prove too costly for non-BCS schools.

There are fears it will increase the disparity between the haves and the have-nots and could prompt another round of conference realignment.

The board also approved a measure that will give individual schools the authority to award scholarships on a multiple-year basis.

Under the current model, those scholarships are renewed annually and can be revoked for any reason. If adopted, schools could guarantee scholarships for the player’s entire career and would be unable to revoke it based solely on athletic performance. Scholarships could still be pulled for reasons such as poor grades, academic misconduct or other forms of improper behavior.

Ridpath said he’s personally been involved with 50 or 60 appeals cases after a coach pulled a player’s scholarship.

“The reason usually is they find a prettier girl to bring to the dance,” he said. “If you’re Frank Beamer or Nick Saban, they make a lot of money, and they should be able to coach that kid up.”

University presidents are moving quickly to repair the damage caused by a year full of scandals.

Schools from Miami to Boise State, including the reigning the champions in football (Auburn) and men’s basketball (Connecticut), have all come under NCAA scrutiny. The U.S. Department of Justice started asking questions about scholarships, Congress has held hearings about a variety of NCAA-related issues and conference realignment has continued to spin wildly.

So, the NCAA’s board went back to basics and placed a renewed emphasis on academics.

In August, the board approved raising the four-year Academic Progress Rate cutline from 900 to 930 and linking that cutline to eligibility for postseason play. On Thursday, it passed a four-year plan to phase in the new requirements.

During the first two years, 2012-13 and 2013-14, teams scoring below 900 on the four-year average would be ineligible for postseason play unless the averaged 930 on the two most recent years of data. In 2014-15, teams that do not hit the 930 mark would be ineligible unless they averaged 940 in the two most recent years. After that, everyone must hit 930, no exceptions.

Schools that do not make the grade could also face additional penalties such as reductions in practice time and game limits, coaches suspensions, scholarship reductions and restricted NCAA membership.

The board also approved a measure to include the provision in its bowl licensing agreements, which means it will apply to football teams, too.

UConn’s men’s basketball team could be the first team to feel the impact.

After posting an 826 last year, a UConn official has said this year’s mark will be approximately 975. It would give Connecticut a two-year score of 900.5 and a four-year average of 888.5 — both too low to make the basketball tourney.

“That’s unfortunate,” Knight Commission member Len Elmore said. “It’s a cautionary tale, but the need for, again, focusing on the true mission of the university is to graduate players and you can’t fail at the most important task whether you’re national champions or not.”

Emmert said if the new rule had been used last year, seven men’s basketball teams and eight football teams would have been ineligible for the postseason. And there’s almost no way out for teams who don’t make the grade.

“You can appeal, but we are going to be very, very strict about appeals,” said Walt Harrison, chairman of the committee on academic performance. “So we really don’t expect waivers to be a major factor.”

As part of the plan, the board agreed to raise eligibility standards for incoming freshmen and junior college transfers. Previously, high school seniors needed a 2.0 GPA in 16 core courses. Now they’ll need a 2.3 and will have to complete 10 of those classes before their senior year.

Junior college transfers will need a 2.5 GPA and can only count two physical education credits toward their eligibility.

The other big issue was summer basketball recruiting.

The board has agreed to drop the text messaging ban and allow unlimited contacts to prep players after June 15 of their sophomore year. But coaches. But instead of having 20 evaluation days in July, coaches will have four in April, previous a dead period, and 12 in July. And they’ll have more on-campus contact with recruits and current players during the summer. Some of those details will be worked out in January.

Jim Haney, executive director of the National Association of Basketball Coaches, said the changes could help limit the influence of agents or unscrupulous coaches, which has become yet another problem for the NCAA.

“In the summer, there are third-parties looking to access our student-athletes as well, work them out,” Haney said. “So by allowing access in the summer, we allow coaches to empower our players to become better players.”

The NCAA still has plenty of issues to tackle.

In January, the board is expected to get recommendations on how to shrink the massive rulebook. On Thursday, it backed a plan to focus on integrity issues rather than specifics, and it could include a new definition of who qualifies as an agent. A vote isn’t expected until April.

The NCAA did not talk about its long-discussed agent registry or forming panel to help college players make decisions about turning pro.

And it still plans to scrap the current two-tiered penalty structure in favor of four categories with specific penalty guidelines. A vote on that will not likely come until next October.

“I think there’s a recognition that the (old) process invited people to step over the line because it was very convoluted,” Elmore said. “Now we’re getting swift, severe sanctions, and that’s what we need.”

21 comments

  1. So it only took the NCAA 4 years to figure out it is impossible to monitor all the phone logs of every program at every school under their charge. So boiled down this means IU simply ran interference for every school in the NCAA. What a prestigious honor. Maybe Kelvin Sanctions should be KNIGHTED. What a cluster……….. Miles Brand proudly was leading.

  2. If these new rules were in effect when Sampson was coach he might very well have pushed the boundary elsewhere. If one is inclined to break rules then one will probably do so.

    Of course, there is no way of knowing either way.

  3. I like the valuable information you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your blog and check again here regularly. I am quite certain I’ll learn lots of new stuff right here! Best of luck for the next!

  4. I support raising the academic requirements for High Schoolers and JC recruits. I applaud putting teeth into the APR cutline. But I suspect some Universities determined to skirt the rules will respond by developing curricula that assure less-academically inclined students exceed the new minimum standards.

    What I don’t see is the announcement for stiffer punishments handed out for those Universities whose coaches or administrators get caught violating the rules. For example, a coach that cheats, lies or is involved in a cover up of cheating should be banned from coaching in the NCAA for ten years. Athletic Administrators that cheat should also be banned from any job with any member of the NCAA. Until the punishment makes cheating not worth the risk, the cheating will continue. It’ll just take on different shapes.

  5. I’d be happy if they implemented the rules and dispensed punishment according to the maximum extent now possible. It makes you uneasy when the Athletic Director of one of their biggest violators heads the commission on compliance as in the case of Miami (FL).

    The NCAA can pass any reforms it wishes. Its integrity is more than questionable when one sees it shamelessly sold out in the Fiesta Bowl fiasco, continues to privilege some schools and conferences over others and does not look internally for the influence of special interests within its own staff or in its various commissions.

  6. The first objectives of any bureaucracy is to get bigger and to protect itself. The NCAA is a classic example of that.

  7. Simply a smiling visitant here to share the love (:, btw great style and design . “The worst-tempered people I’ve ever met were the people who knew they were wrong.” by Wilson Mizner.

  8. Undeniably believe that which you stated. Your favourite reason appeared to be at the web the easiest factor to keep in mind of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while other people consider worries that they plainly don’t realize about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the top and also outlined out the whole thing with no need side effect , other folks could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thank you!

  9. When I originally commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get several emails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove people from that service? Thanks a lot!

  10. I got what you intend, regards for posting .Woh I am pleased to find this website through google. “No one can earn a million dollars honestly.” by William Jennings Bryan.

  11. I have to take advantage of the functionality to thanking an individual to your certified techniques We now have in most cases liked looking at your webpage. We’re waiting for all the start attached to my best university or study in addition the total research wouldn’t being comprehensive without having to available up to your blog site. A lot more are possibly of one’s aid in a number of people, I’ll be privileged to with what I had become familiar with at this point.

  12. It is appropriate time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy. I’ve read this post and if I could I desire to suggest you some interesting things or suggestions. Maybe you could write next articles referring to this article. I desire to read more things about it!

  13. This is a great blog, very informative and well thought out articles. Just thought i would drop my site name to help you guys out, we teach social media marketing through tutorials. We can help you get more visitors to this site through facebook, linkedin and twitter. Check us out, it is worth a look. – http://www.SocialContender.com

Comments are closed.